Research Article
Mitsuki Takeyama
Mitsuki Takeyama
Graduate School of Manufacturing
Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, 165 Koen-Cho, Kitami, Hokkaido
090-8507, Japan.
Yoshihito Kohari
Yoshihito Kohari
Corresponding author:
School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, 165 Koen-Cho, Kitami, Hokkaido 090-8507, Japan.
E-mail: kohari@mail.kitami-it.ac.jp,Tel: +81-157-26-9440.
Miki Murata
Miki Murata
Graduate School of Manufacturing
Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, 165 Koen-Cho, Kitami, Hokkaido
090-8507, Japan.
And
School of Earth, Energy and
Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kitami Institute of
Technology, 165 Koen-Cho, Kitami, Hokkaido 090-8507, Japan.
Abstract
The chemical composition of essential
oils obtained using hydrodistillation of shoots, leaves,
and branches of Sakhalin spruce (Picea glehnii), which exclusively grows in northeastern Hokkaido, Japan,
and southern Sakhalin Oblast, Russia, was quantitatively and qualitatively
determined. Yields of the essential oils were 0.15 ± 0.01% in the shoots, 0.08
± 0.03% in leaves, 0.05 ± 0.02% in branches, and 0.03 ± 0.01% in dried leaves obtained
via vaporization of essential oil components during the drying process. Bornyl
acetate, which is unique to the pine family and is the main contributor to the
fragrance of pine leaves, was found to be present at 42.95 ± 3.35% in the
shoots and 41.20 ± 8.27% in the leaves, while the branches contained a lesser
amount (4.79 ± 1.32%). By contrast, other aerobic components such as α-pinene,
3-carene, β-phellandren and longifolene were found to be more abundant in the
branches.
Abstract Keywords
Essential oils, Sakhalin spruce,
Picea glehnii, hydrodistillation, bornyl acetate, quantitative analysis.
1. Introduction
Pines, which belong to the
gymnosperm and cormophyte families, are widely distributed throughout the
Northern Hemisphere. They
represent the conifers and are important in cultural and religious practices in
many of these regions. Pines are one of the most abundant conifers and are
divided into many species, which include subfamilies such as Pinus, Larch, Fir,
and Spruce [1, 2]. Plants classified in the
spruce subfamily have brown, scaly bark and branches, with "leaf
sinks" from which pointed leaves grow. Spruce trees are commonly used as
lumber for building materials and manufacturing musical instruments. Essential
oils obtained by hydrodistillation of non-woody parts of spruce are widely used
in perfumes, cosmetics, and food additives. The essential oils of spruce plants are
useful resources because of their excellent
antimicrobial activity [3-5]. The components
of spruce essential oil are mostly composed of monoterpenes. The main component
is borneyl acetate, which is a characteristic aroma of pine plants, and pinenes,
ocimene,s camphors, calenes, p-menthane, and thujanes are also known. Unlike
Picea mariana and Picea abies, which are widely distributed
members of the spruce subfamily, Picea glehnii, also known as sakhalin
spruce, first introduced in 1880 [6], is
concentrated in southern Sakhalin, Russia, and eastern Hokkaido, Japan [7]. In Hokkaido, Japan, it is favored for artificial
plantation because it is easy to grow from seedlings, is resistant to disease,
and sprouts late in spring, making it suitable for afforestation in
high-latitude, extremely cold, and heavily snow-covered areas. The objective of
this study is to determine the chemical composition of essential oils obtained
from the rare spruce plant Picea glehnii using GC/MS and GC/FID to
determine the usefulness of these essential oils and to promote their widespread
use.
2.
Materials and methods
2.1 Plant materials
Picea glehnii used in this study was collected in
September 2022 from three sites planted in residential and mountainous
areas of the Okhotsk area of eastern Hokkaido, Japan, to exclude the effects of differences
in growth environments of these plants on essential oil components. The collected Picea glehnii samples
were cut into different parts such as shoots (leaves and branches), leaves, and
branches, and some leaves were dried in a cool, dark place until they weighed
less than 1% of the initial weight to determine the effect of drying on the
essential oils. The moisture content of the leaves was 36.8±1.5% (n = 4).
In this study, as described for other pine families, 200 g of Picea glehnii
shoots (without separating the leaves and branches) were hydrodistilled. After approximately
40 min of distillation, the essential oils were obtained at 0.15 ± 0.01% (n
= 3). To further clarify the essential oils contained in each part, leaves and
branches were separated and 200 g of each was distilled.
2.2 Hydrodistillation (HD) [8]
A total of 200 g each of Picea
glehnii shoots, leaves, branches, and dried leaves (n = 3) were
steam-distilled using a Clevenger apparatus (Tokyo Seisakushiyo, Japan) until
200 mL of the aqueous part was removed. The extracted essential oils were then separated
from the distilled water and stored in a refrigerator at 6°C for further
analysis.
2.3 Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas
chromatography-flame ionization detector analysis
Qualitative analyses of the chemical
composition of essential oils were carried out using ultra-gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS, QP-2010, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with
an InertCap Pure-WAX (polyethylene glycol)-fused silica capillary column (60 m
× 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness). The injector and interface temperatures
were maintained at 250°C, and
helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The essential
oils were diluted with n-hexane and injected using 1.0 μL aliquots to perform
GC. The column temperature was programmed for heating from 50 to 180°C at 2oC/min,
with initial and final hold times of 10 min with a split ratio of 100. Mass
spectra were scanned from m/z 30 to 1000 amu. Identification of peaks was
carried out using NIST14 library data supplied with the GC/MS system (NIST 14:
Mass Spectral Library & Search Software, 2014) and via co-injection of
commercially available α-pinene,β-pinene, sabinene, d-limonene, bornyl
acetate, and caryophyllene.
Quantitative
analyses of the chemical composition of the essential oils were performed using
GC equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID, GC-2014, Shimadzu,
Japan). The capillary column, flow of helium gas, temperature conditions, and
split ratio for GC-FID analysis were the same as those described for GC/MS. The injector and detector
temperature were maintained at 250°C. The essential oils were analyzed using tridecane
as an internal standard, diluted with n-hexane, and injected in 1.0 μL
aliquots. The retention index (RI) of the essential oil components was calculated using
standard alkane solutions (C8-C20 and C20-C40).
The percentage and concentration of bornyl acetate were calculated using an
internal standard based on the GC-FID peak areas, and the contents of other chemical
components were calculated based on the GC-FID peak areas with FID response
factors [9].
3.
Results and discussion
Essential oils from pine plants are
usually produced by hydrodistillation of shoots. Essential oils were obtained
from leaves and branches at yields of 0.08 ± 0.03% (n = 3) and 0.05 ±
0.02% (n = 3), respectively. Although the season of collection has been
reported to have a significant effect on yield of oils [10],
it is clear that the yield of essential oils obtained from Picea
glehnii was lower than that obtained from other Picea
subfamilies (1.01% [11] in Picea abies L,
0.96% [12] in Picea pungens and 0.91% [13] in
Picea engelmannii). The combined amounts of essential oils obtained from
leaves and branches were almost identical to those obtained from shoots,
indicating that, unexpectedly, more essential oils were extracted from the
branches. The dried leaves were then hydrodistilled to determine the effect of
the drying process, which was performed to efficiently obtain essential oils
from the plant. The percentage of essential oils obtained from the dried leaves
was 0.03 ± 0.01%, indicating that, in Picea glehnii, a large portion of
the essential oil is lost through the drying process. Such results were
obtained probably because essential oils in other essential oil-producing
plants such as Mentha accumulate in oil cells present on the leaf surface,
whereas Pinus plants secrete essential oils to the outside through secretory
ducts [14]. Next, to determine the chemical
composition of the essential oils obtained from each part of Picea glehnii,
GC-MS was used for qualitative analysis. (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. MS chromatogram of essential oils obtained from Picea
glehnii shoots
The composition of the obtained
essential oils was found to be dominated by monoterpenes derived from geranyl
diphosphate (GPP), which is produced by condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate
(IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) derived from the mevalonic acid
pathway, which is universally found in common plants [15].
The following compounds were identified: cis-β-ocimene (acyclic), camphor (camphor),
3-carene (carenes), d-limonene (p-menthanes), α and β-pinene (pinenes), sabinene (thujanes);
bornyl acetate, a characteristic aromatic component of pine
plants, was also found in the essential
oils
of Picea glehnii shoots. (Fig. 2) The
results are similar to those reported for other essential oils of the spruce
family.
Figure 2. Structure of compounds in Picea glehnii shoots essencial oil.
Next, to determine the chemical composition of the essential oils obtained from each site, each component was qualitatively determined using GC-MS and quantified using an internal standard employing GC-FID. (Table 1).
Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils obtained from Picea glehnii
Compounds |
Oil content (%) |
||||||||||||
RI |
Shoots |
Leaves |
Branches |
Dried leaves |
|||||||||
Tricyclene |
1003 |
0.11 |
± |
0.03 |
0.01 |
± |
0.01 |
0.09 |
± |
0.07 |
0.02 |
± |
0.01 |
α-pinene |
1017 |
2.43 |
± |
0.72 |
0.25 |
± |
0.18 |
15.87 |
± |
8.72 |
0.34 |
± |
0.25 |
Camphene |
1057 |
3.00 |
± |
0.62 |
0.46 |
± |
0.36 |
0.57 |
± |
0.28 |
0.57 |
± |
0.39 |
β-Pinene |
1100 |
0.87 |
± |
0.11 |
0.16 |
± |
0.10 |
2.48 |
± |
0.84 |
0.21 |
± |
0.11 |
Sabinene |
1113 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.80 |
± |
0.38 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
3-Carene |
1139 |
0.12 |
± |
0.04 |
0.02 |
± |
0.00 |
7.70 |
± |
3.76 |
0.01 |
± |
0.01 |
β-Myrcene |
1159 |
0.99 |
± |
0.08 |
0.27 |
± |
0.16 |
2.18 |
± |
0.78 |
0.36 |
± |
0.26 |
D-Limonene |
1191 |
6.42 |
± |
0.29 |
1.28 |
± |
1.31 |
1.87 |
± |
0.86 |
0.56 |
± |
0.30 |
β-Phellandren |
1201 |
3.12 |
± |
0.29 |
0.84 |
± |
0.53 |
9.62 |
± |
2.69 |
1.11 |
± |
0.69 |
γ-Terpinene |
1238 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.01 |
± |
0.00 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
β-Ocimene |
1247 |
0.06 |
± |
0.01 |
0.03 |
± |
0.01 |
0.41 |
± |
0.31 |
0.04 |
± |
0.02 |
p-Cymene |
1262 |
0.05 |
± |
0.00 |
0.03 |
± |
0.01 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.02 |
± |
0.02 |
Terpinolene |
1278 |
0.77 |
± |
0.00 |
0.41 |
± |
0.10 |
2.25 |
± |
1.17 |
0.49 |
± |
0.24 |
dehydro-p-cymene |
1425 |
0.09 |
± |
0.00 |
0.08 |
± |
0.01 |
0.17 |
± |
0.03 |
0.08 |
± |
0.01 |
Citronellal |
1472 |
0.05 |
± |
0.01 |
0.12 |
± |
0.07 |
0.38 |
± |
0.15 |
0.07 |
± |
0.03 |
Camphor |
1502 |
0.20 |
± |
0.12 |
1.06 |
± |
0.56 |
0.14 |
± |
0.11 |
1.34 |
± |
0.52 |
Linalool |
1545 |
0.11 |
± |
0.06 |
0.14 |
± |
0.03 |
0.92 |
± |
0.38 |
0.13 |
± |
0.03 |
Longifolene |
1562 |
0.34 |
± |
0.01 |
0.46 |
± |
0.18 |
12.89 |
± |
4.78 |
0.60 |
± |
0.03 |
Bornyl
acetate |
1585 |
44.07 |
± |
3.14 |
44.00 |
± |
7.74 |
5.34 |
± |
1.04 |
46.94 |
± |
0.85 |
4-Terpineol |
1594 |
0.04 |
± |
0.02 |
0.21 |
± |
0.16 |
1.95 |
± |
0.35 |
0.33 |
± |
0.07 |
β-Famesene |
1664 |
0.03 |
± |
0.03 |
0.50 |
± |
0.35 |
5.32 |
± |
1.44 |
1.55 |
± |
0.28 |
α-Terpineol |
1688 |
0.03 |
± |
0.03 |
0.11 |
± |
0.13 |
0.65 |
± |
0.49 |
0.52 |
± |
0.67 |
endo-Borneol |
1697 |
0.04 |
± |
0.06 |
0.99 |
± |
0.49 |
0.03 |
± |
0.04 |
0.77 |
± |
0.55 |
α-Farnesene |
1737 |
0.24 |
± |
0.08 |
0.91 |
± |
0.58 |
0.31 |
± |
0.23 |
2.37 |
± |
0.31 |
δ-Cadinene |
1740 |
0.83 |
± |
0.06 |
1.27 |
± |
0.50 |
1.84 |
± |
1.31 |
2.85 |
± |
0.35 |
Citronellol |
1759 |
0.06 |
± |
0.01 |
0.27 |
± |
0.18 |
0.28 |
± |
0.40 |
0.17 |
± |
0.13 |
Germacrene-4-ol |
2009 |
0.05 |
± |
0.01 |
0.17 |
± |
0.02 |
0.45 |
± |
0.63 |
0.24 |
± |
0.04 |
τ-Cadinol |
2041 |
0.25 |
± |
0.06 |
0.24 |
± |
0.06 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.44 |
± |
0.03 |
δ-Cadinol |
2050 |
0.07 |
± |
0.03 |
0.06 |
± |
0.02 |
0.02 |
± |
0.04 |
0.10 |
± |
0.01 |
α-Cadinol |
2060 |
0.59 |
± |
0.16 |
0.53 |
± |
0.13 |
0.12 |
± |
0.10 |
0.61 |
± |
0.04 |
Citronellic
acid |
2066 |
0.03 |
± |
0.01 |
0.04 |
± |
0.01 |
0.00 |
± |
0.00 |
0.06 |
± |
0.01 |
Total |
|
65.07 |
± |
1.14 |
54.92 |
± |
8.06 |
74.67 |
± |
13.97 |
62.92 |
± |
2.59 |
The
results revealed 31 components and their contents. Interestingly, the content
of borneyl acetate, a component of the aroma of plants belonging to the spruce
subfamily that is used as a food additive and flavoring agent, was 44.07% in
the shoots (44.00% in leaves, 5.34% in branches, and 46.94% in dried leaves). Moreover,
most of this compound was present in the needle-like leaf parts but was present
in lower amounts in the branches. Notably. this value is very high compared to
that of other members of the spruce subfamily such as Picea pungens (2.4%) [13], Picea. pungens (29.40%), Picea mariana
(21.64%), and Picea. glauca (31.25%) [16]. When
the chemical composition of the leaves and branches were compared, it was
observed that a higher content of the precursor of borneol acetate, borneol, was
present in the leaves (0.99% in leaves compared to 0.03% in branches). These
results suggest that borneol acetyltransferase, which synthesizes borneol and
acetyl-CoA to bornyl acetate, may be abundant in the leaves. In addition, the
leaves had a high content of camphor (1.06% in leaves compared to 0.14% in
branches). Nevertheless, higher contents of many other components are thought
to be produced in branches. For example, the bicyclic monoterpene, sabinene,
which is found in a variety of plants, has been suggested to be derived from
branches and not from leaves (1.06% in leaves compared
to 0.14% in branches). Furthermore, a comparison of dried and non-dried leaves
confirmed that drying decreased the yield of essential oils, but increased the
content of most other quantifiable components. However, the content of
d-limonene decreased after the drying process (1.28% in fresh leaves compared
to 0.56% in dried leaves) The reason for this is presumably due to its
transformation into other compounds, i.e., carvone and carbonyl, through oxidation
during the drying process.
4.
Conclusions
In
summary, essential oils obtained from Picea glehnii contained higher
concentrations of borneyl acetate (44.07% in the shoots, 44.00% in leaves and
5.34% in branches), a main component that contributes to fragrance, than those
obtained from other pine species, suggesting its use as a food additive or
flavoring agent. It was also found that the drying process is not suitable as a
method to produce essential oils because it significantly reduces the yield. As
a future development of this study, the biological activity of the essential
oils obtained from other Picea and Picea glehnii will be compared. In addition,
seasonal variations in the composition of Picea glehnii essential oil will be
studied to ensure its stable use.
Authors’
contributions
Investigation,
T.M.; Methodology and writing–original draft, K.Y.; Project administration, M.M.
Funding
This
research received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Availability
of data and materials
All
data will be made available on request according to the journal policy.
Conflicts
of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Page, C.N. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. Pinaceae. Kramer, K.U.; Green, P.S. (eds) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, DEU, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-3-662-02604-5_58.
2. Aljos F. Pines, 2nd revised edition. Drawings and Descriptions of the Genus Pinus. Brill Leiden, NL, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047415169.
3. Canillac, N.; Mourey, A. Antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Picea excelsa on Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus and coliform bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2001, 18, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.2000.0397.
4. Theodor, K.; Franz, S.; Franz, R. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of young pine shoots (Picea abies L.). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 35 (2),155–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(91)90067-N.
5. Nabil, H.; Ksenia, M.; Giustino, T.; Matteo, S.; Giovanna, F. Antimicrobial effect of Picea abies extracts on E. coli growth. Molecules. 2019, 24(22), 4053. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224053z.
6. Gard. Chron. XⅢ, 1880, (13), 300–302.
7. Savill, P.; Wilson, S.; Mason, M. Alternative spruces to Sitka and Norway. Quart. J. Forest. 2017, 111, 88–97.
8. Rubiolo, P.; Sgorbini, B.; Liberto, E.; Cordero, C.; Bicchi, C. Essential oils and volatiles: sample preparation and analysis. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1984.
9. Scanlon, J. T.; Willis, D.E. Calculation of flame ionization detector relative response factors using the effective carbon number concept. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1985, 23, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/23.8.333.
10. Katja, S.; Nina, K.G.; Samo, K. Volatile compounds in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) significantly vary with season. Plants. 2023, 12 (1), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010188.
11. Valeria, R.; Crina, S.; Carmen, C.; Eliza, O.; Diana, C.I.; Luminita, M.; Veronica, L. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil from shoots spruce (Picea abies L). Rev. Chim. 2011, 62 (1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.37358/Rev.Chim.1949.
12. Kathy, S.; Ambika, P.; Prabodh, S.; William, N.S. Chemical composition and enantiomeric distribution of Picea pungens essential oil. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2021, 9 (4), 14–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.22271/23219114.
13. Kathy, S.; Prabodh, S.; Ambika, P.; William, N.S. Gymnosperms of Idaho: Chemical compositions and enantiomeric distributions of essential oils of Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Thuja plicata. Molecules. 2023. 28. 2477. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/molecules28062477.
14. Burzo, I; Toma, Irina; Mihaescu, D.E; Toma, C. Comparative study of the secretory structures and volatile oils in some pinus species. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Al. I. Cuza" din Iasi: Biologie Vegetala, Serie Noua. Sectiunea II A; Iasi. 2004, 50, 5–12.
15. Croteau, R.; Kutchan M.T. Norman, G.L. Natural products (Secondary Metabolites). Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, Buchanan B.; Gruissem W.; Jones R. Eds. 2000.
16. Alpaslan, K.; Ömer, K. Identification of essential oil composition of four Picea mill. (Pinaceae) species from Canada. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 2014, B4, 209–214.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Abstract
The chemical composition of essential
oils obtained using hydrodistillation of shoots, leaves,
and branches of Sakhalin spruce (Picea glehnii), which exclusively grows in northeastern Hokkaido, Japan,
and southern Sakhalin Oblast, Russia, was quantitatively and qualitatively
determined. Yields of the essential oils were 0.15 ± 0.01% in the shoots, 0.08
± 0.03% in leaves, 0.05 ± 0.02% in branches, and 0.03 ± 0.01% in dried leaves obtained
via vaporization of essential oil components during the drying process. Bornyl
acetate, which is unique to the pine family and is the main contributor to the
fragrance of pine leaves, was found to be present at 42.95 ± 3.35% in the
shoots and 41.20 ± 8.27% in the leaves, while the branches contained a lesser
amount (4.79 ± 1.32%). By contrast, other aerobic components such as α-pinene,
3-carene, β-phellandren and longifolene were found to be more abundant in the
branches.
Abstract Keywords
Essential oils, Sakhalin spruce,
Picea glehnii, hydrodistillation, bornyl acetate, quantitative analysis.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Dr. Radosław Kowalski
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License.(CC BY-NC 4.0).