Research Article
Prabodh Satyal
Prabodh Satyal
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA
Noura S. Dosoky
Noura S. Dosoky
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA
Ambika Poudel
Ambika Poudel
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA
Kathy Swor
Kathy Swor
Independent
Researcher, 1432 W. Heartland Dr, Kuna, ID 83634, USA
William N. Setzer
William N. Setzer
Corresponding
author
Aromatic Plant
Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA
And
Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
E-mail: wsetzer@chemistry.uah.edu; Tel.: +1-256-468-2862
Received: 2023-03-15 | Revised:2023-04-03 | Accepted: 2023-04-04 | Published: 2023-04-05
Pages: 115-121
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58985/jeopc.2023.v01i02.16
Abstract
Yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus) is native to the Great Basin of North America and the plant
was part of the traditional medicine of Native Americans in the region. There
has been very little previous work on essential oils of Chrysothamnus,
and no reports on C. viscidiflorus essential oil. Therefore, the purpose
of this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of C. viscidiflorus
essential oil. The aerial parts of C. viscidiflorus were collected from
southwestern Idaho, the essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation and
analyzed by gas chromatographic methods. The essential oil was obtained in
1.121% yield and was dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons (82.6%), including (–)-β-pinene
(41.3%), (+)-limonene (17.4%), (+)-sabinene (9.1%), myrcene (4.2%), and (E)-β-ocimene
(4.2%). This is the first report on the essential oil characterization of C.
viscidiflorus, and adds to our understanding of the volatile phytochemistry
of Chrysothamnus. Biological activities of the major components in the
essential oil are consistent with the traditional Native American use of the
plant.
Keywords
Yellow rabbitbrush, low
rabbitbrush, gas chromatography, enantiomeric distribution, chiral
1.
Introduction
Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus Nutt. (Asteraceae) is fairly widespread throughout the Great
Basin of North America, ranging from British Columbia and Montana south to New
Mexico, Arizona, and eastern California [1]. Shoshoni Native
Americans applied a poultice of crushed stems and leaves of C. viscidiflorus
to treat rheumatism; the Paiute people took an infusion of crushed leaves to
treat colds [2]. There are probably
three subspecies in Idaho: C. viscidiflorus subsp. lanceolatus
H.M. Hall & Clem., C. viscidiflorus subsp. puberulus H.M.
Hall & Clem., and C. viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus (Hook.)
Nutt. [3]. Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus
grows up to 1 m tall. The leaves are glabrous and viscid, 1 to 6 cm long and
generally more than 1.5 cm wide (Fig. 1) [1,4]. The viscidiflorus
subspecies ranges throughout the Great Basin (Fig. 2) [4].
Previous phytochemical
investigations of C. viscidiflorus have shown the plant to be a source
of flavonoids [5], labdane diterpenoids [6], benzofuranoids,
chromanones [7], guaiane, germacrane,
and eudesmane sesquiterpenoids, coumarins, and p-coumaric acid
derivatives [8]. To our knowledge, there
have been no previous reports on the essential oil composition of C.
viscidiflorus. Because C. viscidiflorus was important in Native
American ethnopharmacology and the essential oil had not been previously
investigated, the purpose of this investigation was to obtain and analyze the
essential oil of C. viscidiflorus.
2.
Materials and methods
2.1 Plant
Material
Aerial parts of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus were collected from several plants near Pine, Idaho (43°24ʹ20ʺN, 115°17ʹ33ʺW, 1426 m elevation) on June 28, 2022. The plant was identified by W.N. Setzer. Based on botanical descriptions [1,4] and comparison with herbarium samples from the New York Botanical Garden [9], the plant was identified as C. viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus from southwestern Idaho. Photograph by K. Swor.
A voucher specimen (WNS-Cvv-5686)
has been deposited in the University of Alabama in Huntsville herbarium. The
fresh plant material from several plants was combined and 108.9 g was
hydrodistilled using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus to give 1.221 g of a yellow
essential oil.
Figure 2. Range of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus.
Adapted from Anderson [4].
2.2
Gas
Chromatographic Analysis
The essential oil of C.
viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus aerial parts was analyzed by GC-MS using a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010
Ultra (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) operated in the
electron impact (EI) mode (electron energy = 70 eV), scan range = 40–400 atomic
mass units, scan rate = 3.0 scans/s, and GC-MS solution software. The GC column
was a ZB-5ms fused silica capillary column (60 m length × 0.25 mm inner
diameter) with a (5% phenyl)-polymethylsiloxane stationary phase and a film
thickness of 0.25 μm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The carrier gas was
helium with a column head pressure of 208.3 kPa and flow rate of 2.0 mL/min.
Injector temperature was 260 °C and the ion source temperature was 260 °C. The
GC oven temperature program was programmed for 50 °C initial temperature,
temperature increased at a rate of 2 °C/min to 260 °C, then held at 260 °C for 5 min. A 5% w/v solution of the sample in
CH2Cl2 was prepared and 0.1 μL was injected with a splitting
mode (24.5:1). Retention index (RI) values were calculated using a homologous
series of n-alkanes [10]. The essential oil components were identified by comparing their RI
values and their MS fragmentation patterns with those reported in the Adams [11], FFNSC3 [12], NIST20 [13], and Satyal [14] databases.
Gas
chromatography – flame ionization detection (GC-FID) was carried out using a Shimadzu GC 2010 with FID detector (Shimadzu Scientific
Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) and a ZB-5 GC column (60 m ´
0.25 mm ´ 0.25 μm film thickness) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA),
using the same operating conditions as above for GC-MS. The percent
compositions were determined from raw peak areas without standardization.
The C. viscidiflorus subsp.
viscidiflorus essential oil was analyzed by chiral GC-MS using a Shimadzu
GCMS-QP2010S (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) instrument
fitted with a Restek B-Dex 325 column (30 m ´ 0.25 mm diameter ´
0.25 μm film thickness) (Restek Corp., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The injector and
detector temperatures were 240 °C. Helium was the carrier gas with a column
head pressure of 53.6 kPa and a flow rate of 1.00 mL/min. The GC oven was
programmed with an initial temperature of 50 °C, held for 5 min, then increased
to 100 °C at a rate of 1.0 °C/min, then increased to 220 °C at a rate of 2
°C/min. For each essential oil sample, 0.3 μL of a 5% (w/v) solution in
dichloromethane was injected using a splitting mode of 24.0:1. The enantiomeric
distributions were determined by comparison of retention times with authentic
samples obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). The enantiomer
percentages were determined from raw peak areas.
2.3 Antimicrobial Screening
The essential oil components were
screened for antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC
No. 29213), Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC No. 49136), and Streptococcus
pyogenes (ATCC No. 19615); and antifungal activity against Cryptococcus
neoformans (ATCC No. 32045) using the microbroth dilution technique [15], as previously reported [16]. The individual
essential oil components, (–)-β-pinene,
(+)-limonene, and myrcene, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and
were used as received, without additional purification. Antibacterial and
antifungal positive controls were gentamicin and amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO), respectively; dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO) was the negative control.
3. Results and discussion
A yellow essential oil in 1.121%
yield (w/w, based on fresh plant
material) was obtained by hydrodistillation of the aerial parts of C.
viscidiflorus. Gas chromatographic analysis (GC-MS and GC-FID) revealed a
total of 66 compounds accounting for 93.6% of the total composition (Table 1).
The essential oil was dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons (82.6%), including
the major components β-pinene (41.4%),
limonene (18.8%), sabinene (9.1%), myrcene (4.2%), and (E)-β-ocimene (4.2%).
Very few essential oils of Chrysothamnus
species have been reported. The essential oil of Chrysothamnus pulchellus
Green (syn. Lorandersonia pulchella (A. Gray) Urbatsch, R.P. Robers
& Neubig) from Mexico had sesquicineole (22.7%), β-phellandrene (14.9%), (Z)-β-ocimene
(9–4%), β-pinene (8.8%), (E)-β-ocimene (6.4%), (E)-β-caryophyllene
(3.3%), and δ-cadinene (2.8%) as major components [17]. There are three reports
on the essential oil composition of Chrysothamnus nauseosus (Pall. ex
Pursh) Britton (syn. Ericameria nauseosa (Pursh) G.L. Nesom & G.I.
Baird) [18–20]. The major components
were β-phellandrene (1.8-56.5%), β-pinene
(0.3-23.3%), limonene (0.7-22.3%), (Z)-β-ocimene
(0.0-29.3%), and myrcene (0.0-12.9%).
The enantiomeric distributions of
chiral terpenoids in C. viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus were
determined by chiral GC-MS (Table 2). In the essential oil of C.
viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus, (+)-α-thujene
(75.5%) was the dominant enantiomer, (–)-α-pinene (94.5%)
predominated over (+)-α-pinene (5.5%), (+)-sabinene was the
exclusive enantiomer, and (–)-β-pinene (99.8%) was
the major enantiomer. Interestingly, (+)-limonene (92.3%)
dominated while (–)-β-phellandrene (95.6%) was the dominant enantiomer. (–)-α-Thujone was the exclusive enantiomer observed. Both (+)-cis-sabinene
hydrate (86.1%) and (+)-trans-sabinene hydrate (90.5%) were the major
enantiomers, (+)-terpinen-4-ol (71.9%) was the major enantiomer while (–)-α-terpineol
(87.4%) was dominant. (–)-Germacrene D was the major enantiomer. These enantiomeric
distributions are very different from
Table 1. Chemical composition (percentages based on peak areas) of the
essential oil from the aerial parts of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
subsp. viscidiflorus.
|
RIcalc |
RIdb |
Compound |
% |
RIcalc |
RIdb |
Compound |
% |
|
|
886 |
880 |
1-Methyl-2-pentylcyclopropane |
2.7 |
1323 |
1322 |
Myrtenyl acetate |
tr |
|
|
925 |
925 |
α-Thujene |
0.1 |
1335 |
1335 |
δ-Elemene |
0.2 |
|
|
933 |
933 |
α-Pinene |
2.6 |
1359 |
1361 |
Neryl acetate |
tr |
|
|
973 |
971 |
Sabinene |
9.1 |
1380 |
1382 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl hexanoate |
tr |
|
|
979 |
978 |
β-Pinene |
41.4 |
1383 |
1382 |
β-Bourbonene |
tr |
|
|
989 |
989 |
Myrcene |
4.2 |
1384 |
1383 |
cis-β-Elemene |
tr |
|
|
998 |
1003 |
Ethyl hexanoate |
tr |
1389 |
1390 |
trans-β-Elemene |
tr |
|
|
1017 |
1017 |
α-Terpinene |
0.2 |
1392 |
1392 |
(Z)-Jasmone |
tr |
|
|
1025 |
1024 |
p-Cymene |
0.3 |
1418 |
1417 |
(E)-β-Caryophyllene |
0.1 |
|
|
1030 |
1030 |
Limonene |
18.8 |
1429 |
1427 |
γ-Elemene |
tr |
|
|
1032 |
1031 |
β-Phellandrene |
1.1 |
1454 |
1454 |
α-Humulene |
0.1 |
|
|
1035 |
1034 |
(Z)-β-Ocimene |
0.1 |
1474 |
1475 |
γ-Muurolene |
tr |
|
|
1046 |
1045 |
(E)-β-Ocimene |
4.2 |
1477 |
1478 |
γ-Curcumene |
tr |
|
|
1057 |
1057 |
γ-Terpinene |
0.4 |
1480 |
1480 |
Germacrene D |
1.0 |
|
|
1069 |
1069 |
cis-Sabinene hydrate |
0.3 |
1497 |
--- |
Unidentifieda |
1.2 |
|
|
1084 |
1086 |
Terpinolene |
0.2 |
1512 |
1512 |
γ-Cadinene |
0.1 |
|
|
1099 |
1101 |
Linalool |
tr |
1517 |
1518 |
δ-Cadinene |
0.1 |
|
|
1100 |
1101 |
trans-Sabinene hydrate |
0.2 |
1547 |
1546 |
α-Elemol |
0.9 |
|
|
1106 |
1105 |
α-Thujone |
0.2 |
1560 |
1561 |
(E)-Nerolidol |
0.1 |
|
|
1113 |
1113 |
(E)-4,8-Dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene |
tr |
1570 |
1571 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl benzoate |
0.2 |
|
|
1124 |
1124 |
cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol |
0.1 |
1575 |
1574 |
Germacra-1(10),5-dien-4β-ol |
0.1 |
|
|
1138 |
1137 |
Nopinone |
tr |
1592 |
--- |
Unidentifiedb |
4.1 |
|
|
1139 |
1139 |
(E)-Myroxide |
tr |
1626 |
1624 |
Selin-6-en-4β-ol |
tr |
|
|
1141 |
1141 |
trans-Pinocarveol |
0.1 |
1628 |
1629 |
iso-Spathulenol |
0.4 |
|
|
1142 |
1142 |
trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol |
0.1 |
1632 |
1632 |
γ-Eudesmol |
0.1 |
|
|
1153 |
1153 |
p-Vinylanisole |
tr |
1643 |
1643 |
τ-Cadinol |
0.9 |
|
|
1157 |
1157 |
Sabina ketone |
tr |
1645 |
1645 |
τ-Muurolol |
0.1 |
|
|
1162 |
1164 |
Pinocarvone |
tr |
1655 |
1656 |
β-Eudesmol |
0.3 |
|
|
1181 |
1180 |
Terpinen-4-ol |
1.7 |
1656 |
1655 |
α-Cadinol |
0.4 |
|
|
1185 |
1187 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl butanoate |
0.1 |
1672 |
1677 |
Cadalene |
0.1 |
|
|
1187 |
1187 |
Cryptone |
tr |
Monoterpene hydrocarbons |
82.6 |
|||
|
1191 |
1190 |
Methyl salicylate |
tr |
Oxygenated monoterpenoids |
3.1 |
|||
|
1195 |
1195 |
α-Terpineol |
0.4 |
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons |
1.5 |
|||
|
1196 |
1198 |
cis-Piperitol |
tr |
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids |
3.4 |
|||
|
1209 |
1209 |
trans-Piperitol |
tr |
Benzenoid aromatics |
0.2 |
|||
|
1284 |
1285 |
Bornyl acetate |
tr |
Others |
2.8 |
|||
|
1295 |
1296 |
trans-Pinocarvyl acetate |
tr |
Total identified |
93.6 |
|||
|
1320 |
1315 |
p-Mentha-1,4-dien-7-ol |
tr |
|||||
|
RIcalc
= Retention index determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes
on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Reference retention index obtained from
the databases [11–14].
tr = trace (< 0.05%). a
Unidentified sesquiterpenoid, MS(EI): 220(3%), 177(4%),
159(18%), 134(100%), 132(44%), 121(27%), 119(48%), 105(20%), 93(27%),
91(19%), 79(16%), 77(11%), 71(10%), 55(9%), 43(55%), 41(17%). b
Unidentified sesquiterpenoid, MS(EI): 218(1%), 203(1%),
189(3%), 175(23%), 147(15%), 132(16%), 120(51%), 105(100%), 91(19%), 79(9%),
77(11%), 55(8%), 43(14%), 41(18%). |
||||||||
those observed for Chrysothamnus
nauseosus (syn Ericameria nauseosa) where (–)-α-thujene, (–)-sabinene, (–)-limonene,
(–)-cis-sabinene
hydrate, (–)-trans-sabinene hydrate, and (–)-terpinen-4-ol
were the dominant enantiomers [20].
The major components found in C.
viscidiflorus essential oil have demonstrated biological activities
consistent with the traditional Native American use of the plant to treat
rheumatism. β-Pinene has demonstrated both antinociceptive [21] and anti-inflammatory
activities [22]. Limonene has shown both
antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities [23, 24]. Importantly,
(+)-limonene has shown antinociceptive activity [25] and anti-inflammatory
activity [26,27]. Sabinene has shown
anti-inflammatory effects [28,29]. Myrcene demonstrated
antinociceptive activity [30, 31] as well as anti-inflammatory activity [28].
Numerous essential oil components
have been identified that exhibit inhibitory activity against respiratory tract
infections and pathogens [32, 33]. The
commercially-available essential oil components, (–)-β-pinene, (+)-limonene,
and myrcene, have been screened for antimicrobial activity against the
respiratory pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae,
Streptococcus pyogenes, and Cryptococcus neoformans (Table 3).
Table
2. Chemical compositions (% enantiomer) of the essential oil
from the aerial parts of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus.
|
Compound |
RTstd |
RTEO |
Compo-sition
(%) |
|
(+)-α-Thujene |
13.92 |
13.90 |
75.5 |
|
(–)-α-Thujene |
13.99 |
13.97 |
24.5 |
|
(–)-α-Pinene |
15.92 |
15.84 |
94.5 |
|
(+)-α-Pinene |
16.40 |
16.42 |
5.5 |
|
(+)-Sabinene |
19.68 |
19.16 |
100.0 |
|
(–)-Sabinene |
20.60 |
nd |
0.0 |
|
(+)-β-Pinene |
20.08 |
19.60 |
0.2 |
|
(–)-β-Pinene |
20.28 |
19.96 |
99.8 |
|
(–)-Limonene |
25.06 |
25.02 |
7.7 |
|
(+)-Limonene |
25.99 |
25.44 |
92.3 |
|
(–)-β-Phellandrene |
26.15 |
26.34 |
95.6 |
|
(+)-β-Phellandrene |
26.88 |
26.87 |
4.4 |
|
(+)-cis-Sabinene
hydrate |
40.70 |
40.70 |
86.1 |
|
(–)-cis-Sabinene
hydrate |
41.25 |
41.26 |
13.9 |
|
(+)-α-Thujone |
43.56 |
nd |
0.0 |
|
(–)-α-Thujone |
44.88 |
45.06 |
100.0 |
|
(+)-trans-Sabinene
hydrate |
46.15 |
46.11 |
90.5 |
|
(–)-trans-Sabinene
hydrate |
46.84 |
46.84 |
9.5 |
|
(+)-Terpinen-4-ol |
54.64 |
54.56 |
71.9 |
|
(–)-Terpinen-4-ol |
54.93 |
55.00 |
28.1 |
|
(–)-α-Terpineol |
59.73 |
59.74 |
87.4 |
|
(+)-α-Terpineol |
60.58 |
60.54 |
12.6 |
|
(+)-Germacrene
D |
73.48 |
73.44 |
33.4 |
|
(–)-Germacrene
D |
73.73 |
73.70 |
66.6 |
|
RTstd
= Retention time (min) of the standard chemicals. RTEO = Retention
time (min) of the essential oil components. nd = not detected. |
|||
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity (MIC, μg/mL)
of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. viscidiflorus major
essential oil componentsa
|
Compound |
S. aureus |
S.
pneumoniae |
S. pyogenes |
C. neofor-mans |
|
(–)-β-Pinene |
156.3 |
39.1 |
625 |
625 |
|
(+)-Limonene |
312.5 |
78.1 |
312.5 |
312.5 |
|
Myrcene |
312.5 |
625 |
625 |
312.5 |
|
Positive controlb |
0.61 |
< 19.5 |
< 19.5 |
0.39 |
|
DMSOc |
1250 |
1250 |
1250 |
1250 |
|
aBased on three
replicates. b Gentamicin for bacteria, Amphotericin B for C.
neoformans. c Dimethylsulfoxide negative control. S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus; S. pneumoniae: Streptococcus pneumoniae; S. pyogenes: Streptococcus pyogenes; C. neoformans: Cryptococcus
neoformans |
||||
Both S. aureus and S.
pneumoniae were particularly susceptible to the essential oil components.
Furthermore, β-pinene and (+)-limonene have shown good anti-Klebsiella
pneumoniae (MIC 8-64 μg/mL) [34]; β-pinene, (+)-limonene, myrcene, and sabinene have shown
good activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MIC 10.4, 25.0, 25.0,
and 33.3 μg/mL, respectively) [35]. The antimicrobial
activities of the major components of C. viscidiflorus essential oil
indicate potential effectiveness against respiratory infections and may account
for the Native American use of C. viscidiflorus to treat colds.
4. Conclusions
As far as we are aware, this is the
first report on the essential oil characterization of C. viscidiflorus,
and adds to our understanding of the volatile phytochemistry of Chrysothamnus.
The biological activities of the major components are consistent with the
traditional Native American use of C. viscidiflorus to treat rheumatism
and colds. Clearly, additional research is needed on other species of Chrysothamnus
as well as infraspecific taxa of Chrysothamnus species in order to more
fully define the volatile phytochemistry of the genus in terms of common
components or marker compounds or to provide chemical profiles to differentiate
species and subspecies.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, W.N.S.;
Methodology, P.S., N.S.D., and W.N.S.; Software, P.S.; Validation, W.N.S.,
Formal Analysis, P.S., N.S.D., A.P., and W.N.S.; Investigation, P.S., N.S.D.,
A.P., K.S., and W.N.S.; Resources, P.S. and W.N.S.; Data Curation, W.N.S.;
Writing – Original Draft Preparation, W.N.S.; Writing, Review & Editing,
P.S., N.S.D., A.P., K.S., and W.N.S.; Project Administration, W.N.S.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out as part
of the activities of the Aromatic Plant Research Center (APRC,
https://aromaticplant.org/).
Funding
This research received no specific
grant from any funding agency.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of
interest.
References
1. McArthur, E.D.; Taylor, J.R. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus
Nutt. low rabbitbrush. In Wildland Shrubs of the United States and Its
Territories: Thamnic Descriptions: Volume 1; Francis, J.K., Ed.; United
States Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort
Collins, Colorado, USA, 2004; pp. 209–211.
2. Moerman, D.E. Native American Ethnobotany;
Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, OR, 1998; ISBN 978-0-88192-453-4.
3. Tilley, D.; St. John, L. Plant Guide for
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus); Aberdeen, Idaho, USA,
2012.
4. Anderson, L.C. Identity of narrow-leaved Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus (Asteraceae). Gt. Basin Nat. 1980, 40, 117–120.
5. Urbatsch, L.E.; Bacon, J.D.; Mabry, T.J.
Flavonol methyl ethers from Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. Phytochemistry
1975, 14, 2279–2282,
doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)91116-6.
6. Ngo, L.-V.; Thi, V.C.P. Viscidic acid A and B,
two ent-labdane derivatives from Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. Phytochemistry
1980, 19, 1971–1974.
7. Ngo, L.-V.; Thi, V.C.P. An unusual m-hydroxyacetophenone
and three new chromanone derivatives from Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. Phytochemistry
1981, 20, 485–487,
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84171-0.
8. Ahmed, A.A.; Hegazy, M.E.F.; Hassan, N.M.;
Wojcinska, M.; Karchesy, J.; Pare, P.W.; Mabry, T.J. Constituents of Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1547–1553, doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.03.021.
9. New York Botanical Garden, N.Y.B.G. C. V.
Starr Virtual Herbarium Available online:
https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/vh/specimen-list/?SummaryData=Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus (accessed on Jun 29, 2022).
10. van
den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system
including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J.
Chromatogr. A 1963, 11,
463–471, doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X.
11. Adams,
R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry; 4th ed.; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007;
ISBN 978-1-932633-21-4.
12. Mondello,
L. FFNSC 3; Shimadzu Scientific Instruments: Columbia, Maryland, USA,
2016.
13. NIST20;
National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA,
2020.
14. Satyal,
P. Development of GC-MS Database of Essential Oil Components by the Analysis of
Natural Essential Oils and Synthetic Compounds and Discovery of Biologically
Active Novel Chemotypes in Essential Oils, Ph.D. dissertation, University of
Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2015.
15. EUCAST
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial
agents by broth dilution. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, ix–xv,
doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00790.x.
16. Poudel,
D.K.; Dangol, S.; Rokaya, A.; Maharjan, S.; Ojha, P.K.; Rana, J.; Dahal, S.;
Timsina, S.; Dosoky, N.S.; Satyal, P.; et al. Quality assessment of Zingiber
officinale Roscoe essential oil from Nepal. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022, 17, 1934578X221080322,
doi:10.1177/1934578X221080322.
17. Tellez,
M.R.; Estell, R.E.; Fredrickson, E.L.; Havstad, K.M. Essential oil of Chrysothamnus
pulchellus (Gray) Greene ssp. pulchellus. J. Essent. Oil Res.
1998, 10, 201–204,
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1998.9700880.
18. Chao,
S.; Young, D.G.; Casabianca, H.; Bertrand, M.-C. Composition of the oils of
three Chrysothamnus nauseousus varieties. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2003, 15, 425–427,
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2003.9698630.
19. Tabanca,
N.; Demirci, B.; Crockett, S.L.; Başer, K.H.C.; Wedge, D.E. Chemical
composition and antifungal activity of Arnica longifolia, Aster
hesperius, and Chrysothamnus nauseosus essential oils. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 2007, 55,
8430–8435, doi:10.1021/jf071379c.
20. Stirling,
J.; Platt, B.G.; Satyal, P.; Swor, K.; Setzer, W.N. The essential oils of
rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa) from north-central Utah and
southwestern Idaho. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2023, 18, 1934578X231161186, doi:10.1177/1934578X231161186.
21. Liapi,
C.; Anifantis, G.; Chinou, I.; Kourounakis, A.P.; Theodosopoulos, S.;
Galanopoulou, P. Antinociceptive properties of 1,8-cineole and β-pinene, from
the essential oil of Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaves, in rodents. Planta
Med. 2007, 73,
1247–1254, doi:10.1055/s-2007-990224.
22. Santos,
E.S.; Coelho, G.L.A.; Loula, Y.K.S.F.; Landim, B.L.S.; Lima, C.N.F.; Machado,
S.T.S.; Lopes, M.J.P.; Gomes, A.D.S.; da Costa, J.G.M.; de Menezes, I.R.A.; et
al. Hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and anti-inflammatory effects of beta-pinene
in diabetic rats. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, ID 8173307, doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8173307.
23. Cheraghi,
J.; Valadi, A. Effects of anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory component of
limonene in herbal drugs. Iran. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2010, 26, 415–422.
24. Huang,
X.-L.; Li, X.-J.; Qin, Q.-F.; Li, Y.-S.; Zhang, W.K.; Tang, H.-B.
Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects of active ingredients in the
essential oils from Gynura procumbens, a traditional medicine and a new
and popular food material. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 239, 111916, doi:10.1016/j.jep.2019.111916.
25. do
Amaral, J.F.; Silva, M.I.G.; Neto, M.R. de A.; Neto, P.F.T.; Moura, B.A.; de
Melo, C.T.V.; de Araújo, F.L.O.; de Sousa, D.P.; de Vasconcelos, P.F.; de
Vasconcelos, S.M.M.; et al. Antinociceptive effect of the monoterpene R-(+)-limonene
in mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007,
30, 1217–1220, doi:10.1248/bpb.30.1217.
26. D’Alessio,
P.A.; Ostan, R.; Bisson, J.-F.; Schulzke, J.D.; Ursini, M. V.; Béné, M.C. Oral
administration of d-limonene controls inflammation in rat colitis and displays
anti-inflammatory properties as diet supplementation in humans. Life Sci.
2013, 92, 1151–1156,
doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2013.04.013.
27. Yu,
L.; Yan, J.; Sun, Z. d-Limonene exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant
properties in an ulcerative colitis rat model via regulation of iNOS, COX-2,
PGE2 and ERK signaling pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 2339–2346, doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.6241.
28. Valente,
J.; Zuzarte, M.; Liberal, J.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Lopes, M.C.; Cavaleiro, C.;
Cruz, M.T.; Salgueiro, L. Margotia gummifera essential oil as a source
of anti-inflammatory drugs. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 47, 86–91, doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.036.
29. Valente,
J.; Zuzarte, M.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Lopes, M.C.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.;
Cruz, M.T. Antifungal, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Oenanthe
crocata L. essential oil. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 62, 349–354,
doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.083.
30. Lorenzetti,
B.B.; Souza, G.E.P.; Sarti, S.J.; Filho, D.S.; Ferreira, S.H. Myrcene mimics
the peripheral analgesic activity of lemongrass tea. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 34, 43–48,
doi:10.1016/0378-8741(91)90187-I.
31. Paula-Freire,
L.I.G.; Andersen, M.L.; Molska, G.R.; Köhn, D.O.; Carlini, E.L.A. Evaluation of
the antinociceptive activity of Ocimum gratissimum L. (Lamiaceae)
essential oil and its isolated active principles in mice. Phyther. Res. 2013, 27, 1220–1224,
doi:10.1002/ptr.4845.
32. Leigh-de
Rapper, S.; van Vuuren, S.F. Odoriferous therapy: A review identifying
essential oils against pathogens of the respiratory tract. Chem. Biodivers.
2020, 17, e200062, doi:10.1002/cbdv.202000062.
33. Li,
J.; Chen, W.; Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Xiang, S.; You, F.; Jiang, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhang,
D.; Zheng, C. Pharmacologic effects approach of essential oils and their
components on respiratory diseases. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 304,
115962, doi:10.1016/j.jep.2022.115962.
34. Orhan,
I.E.; Ozcelik, B.; Kan, Y.; Kartal, M. Inhibitory effects of various essential
oils and individual components against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)
produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae and their chemical compositions. J.
Food Sci. 2011, 76, M538–M546,
doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02363.x.
35. Andrade-Ochoa,
S.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V.; Sánchez-Torres, L.E.; Villanueva-García, M.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, B.E.; Rodríguez-Valdez, L.M.; Rivera-Chavira, B.E.
Quantitative structure-activity relationship of molecules constituent of
different essential oils with antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium
tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis. BMC Complement. Altern.
Med. 2015, 15, 332,
doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0858-2.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Abstract
Yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus
viscidiflorus) is native to the Great Basin of North America and the plant
was part of the traditional medicine of Native Americans in the region. There
has been very little previous work on essential oils of Chrysothamnus,
and no reports on C. viscidiflorus essential oil. Therefore, the purpose
of this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of C. viscidiflorus
essential oil. The aerial parts of C. viscidiflorus were collected from
southwestern Idaho, the essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation and
analyzed by gas chromatographic methods. The essential oil was obtained in
1.121% yield and was dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons (82.6%), including (–)-β-pinene
(41.3%), (+)-limonene (17.4%), (+)-sabinene (9.1%), myrcene (4.2%), and (E)-β-ocimene
(4.2%). This is the first report on the essential oil characterization of C.
viscidiflorus, and adds to our understanding of the volatile phytochemistry
of Chrysothamnus. Biological activities of the major components in the
essential oil are consistent with the traditional Native American use of the
plant.
Abstract Keywords
Yellow rabbitbrush, low
rabbitbrush, gas chromatography, enantiomeric distribution, chiral
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Editor-in-Chief
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License.(CC BY-NC 4.0).